Traffic Violations Archives - Brandt Criminal Defense

Dani Secures Client Careless Driving in DWI Case

Date: August and September 2021
Case: Driving After Suspension and DWI
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was charged with two misdemeanors: Driving After Suspension (DAS) and Fourth Degree DWI after two driving incidents in 2020. After Dani’s client’s proactive steps with a chemical dependency evaluation and safe driving course, Dani was able to negotiate two favorable resolutions for her client. Her client received a lessened charge of a petty misdemeanor for his DAS charge and a lessened charge of Careless Driving for his DWI charge. This allowed her client to avoid supervised probation and a DWI conviction, which could have posed bigger problems for him down the road.

Dani Secures a Continuance of Dismissal

Date: August 2021
Case: Failure to Stop for Stop Sign and Instruction Permit Violation
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was pulled over for not stopping at a stop sign and was found to not have a proper license, but an instruction permit, to drive. Her client faced petty misdemeanor and misdemeanor charges. Through negotiations with the prosecutor, Dani was able to secure a continuance for dismissal for her client on both charges. This means that after one year without a similar offense, her client will have both charges dismissed.

Mike Secures Stay of Adjudication on Reckless Driving Charge

Date: July 2021
Case: Reckless Driving
Attorney: Michael J. Brandt
Result: Mike’s client crashed into a street sign and tree after speeding down a neighborhood street. Mike’s client was charged with Misdemeanor Reckless Driving and Misdemeanor Speeding. Mike explained various details about the legal issues in the case to the prosecutor and negotiated a Stay of Adjudication. As part of the negotiation, the prosecutor also agreed to dismiss the Misdemeanor Speeding charge. Mike’s client pled guilty to Misdemeanor Reckless Driving but the Court Stayed adjudication of this offense, meaning the Court did not accept his plea and did not convict him. Instead, Mike’s client was placed on supervised probation for 1 year. If Mike’s client successfully completes all conditions of probation, the charges will be dismissed in 1 year and Mike’s client will avoid a conviction on his record.

Dani’s Client Receives Continuance for Dismissal In Anoka County

Date: March 2021
Case: Traffic Violation
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was charged with failure to stop for a school bus arm in Anoka County. After reviewing the evidence and discussing the legal issues in the case, Dani was able to get the prosecutor to agree to a continuance for dismissal. If Dani’s client follows the conditions set forth by the Court, after 1 year, the charges will be dismissed.

Dani’s Client Has Expungement Granted in Hennepin County

Date: February 2021
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Dani Peden
Result: Dani’s client was originally convicted of failing to stop for a traffic collision in Hennepin County. Dani agreed to help her client seek an expungement in order to ensure her client would not be negatively affected by the conviction. She was successful in obtaining an expungement order for her client, this means that the charge is no longer publicly viewable on her client’s criminal record.

Misdemeanor speeding ticket reduced to a Petty Misdemeanor

Date: November 2020
Case: Speeding
Attorney: Michael J. Brandt
Result: Mike’s client was charged with a misdemeanor for driving 100mph in a 65mph zone in Hennepin County. The prosecuting attorney insisted that Mike’s client be convicted of a misdemeanor and to be placed on probation. Mike scheduled the case for trial, but on the day of trial the prosecutor finally agreed to amend the charge to a petty misdemeanor and reduce the speed to 89mph in a 65mph zone. Because of this negotiation, Mike’s client was only required to pay a fine and was not subject to probation.

Stay of Adjudication keeps Traffic Offense off of Mike’s Client’s Driving Record

Date: October 2020
Case: Duty to Drive with Due Care
Attorney: Michael J. Brandt
Result: Mike’s client was charged with Failure to Drive with Due Care in the City of Fort Snelling in Hennepin County. On the day of trial, Mike negotiated a disposition called a “stay of adjudication.” Under the stay of adjudication, Mike’s client pled guilty to the charge; however, the judge did not accept his plea nor convict him of the offense. Mike’s client was placed on unsupervised probation for one year and upon successful completion, the charge will be dismissed. Because of the stay of adjudication, this offense will not be reflected on Mike’s client’s driving record.

Danielle’s Client has Driving Charge Expunged in Anoka County

Date: September 2020
Case: Expungement
Attorney: Danielle Peden
Result: Danielle’s client was previously charged with a failing to drive in a single lane in Anoka County. As part of her client’s agreement, the prosecution agreed to suspend prosecution, if Danielle’s client followed certain conditions. Her client followed the conditions, and the case was dismissed. After the dismissal, Danielle helped her client get the charge sealed from their record. Danielle was successful in getting the driving offense expunged, meaning the charge is no longer publicly viewable on her client’s driving record.

Charges Continued for Dismissal Mille Lacs County

Date: June 2020
Case: Speeding Ticket
Attorney: Mike Brandt
Result: Mike’s client was charged with speeding for going 20 mph over the speed limit. Mike reached out to the prosecutor and was able to obtain a continuance for dismissal for his client. This means that in one year the prosecutor will dismiss the case altogether so long as Mike’s client avoids any traffic violations within the year.

Nicole Kettwick has client’s driving after revocation case dismissed

Date: May 2020
Case: Driving After Revocation
Attorney: Nicole Kettwick
Result: Nicole’s client was charged with Driving After Revocation after an incident occurring in Anoka County. Nicole reached out to the prosecutor to discuss the legal issues of the case. After reviewing Nicole’s information, the State decided to outright dismiss the case.

Results Categories